1. there was no real link between the Iraqi leadership and Al Qaida;
2. Iraq posed no immediate threat to the UK;
3. UN Resolutions on Kuwait were used - with legal aadvice being sought but never revealed - as the basis for going to war without giving the UN weapons inspectors adequate time.
Hmm.
Does this make Blair and Bush war criminals for invading Iraq without a mandate or due cause?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-14 05:09 am (UTC)1. there was no real link between the Iraqi leadership and Al Qaida;
2. Iraq posed no immediate threat to the UK;
3. UN Resolutions on Kuwait were used - with legal aadvice being sought but never revealed - as the basis for going to war without giving the UN weapons inspectors adequate time.
Hmm.
Does this make Blair and Bush war criminals for invading Iraq without a mandate or due cause?