in the cupboard
Apr. 3rd, 2006 10:16 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
being tired and hungry, we thought we'd have some porridge this morning, so I found the box with the oats in, and bung the requisite amounts of them, the milk and the water into a bowl, and placed it in the microwave.
and only then noticed that the bag said "best before April 03". How bad could it be, I thought? When they were cooked, they didn't smell very appetising, to be honest; so
perlmonger had a rummage in the cupboard where we keep such things, and emerged triumphantly waving another bag of porridge oats.
"best before 2000", it said.
so we're still hungry.
and only then noticed that the bag said "best before April 03". How bad could it be, I thought? When they were cooked, they didn't smell very appetising, to be honest; so
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
"best before 2000", it said.
so we're still hungry.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-03 09:23 am (UTC)I like to have Oatso Simple porridge for my breakfast, but in our new building there are no microwaves and no hobs, so there goes that. Poo.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-03 11:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-03 11:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-04-03 01:05 pm (UTC)Surprisingly they threw it out because it was "too old", not because it was evil chavfood (nasty popcorn, not the concept itself) or because it was 90% salt and would probably have kept perfectly through a nuclear winter.
I can understand pitching nice food for being past its prime, but this was desperation cupboard stock for consumption only when blind drunk anyway.