ramtops: (Default)
[personal profile] ramtops


and I don't believe it because that was in no way an IQ test, in my book. Odd questions were, but the rest was a mishmash of general knowledge and so forth (and my brain retains loads of useless info, so I'm good at general knowledge).

still, it whiled away half an hour's worth of displacement activity ...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-08 09:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sheepthief.livejournal.com
Image (http://iq-challenge.com/)

It's quite obviously rubbish. I wonder if it takes account of time - did you wander off to put the kettle on half way through?

I think that the following factors point towards it being useless -

1. No answers given.
2. No indication of how calculation was made.
3. Includes cute cartoon.
4. The clincher: you found it on the internet. =;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-08 09:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wruf.livejournal.com
And the image shows a different score to what you got. It says you got 89 and I suspect you got a lot more than that.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-05-08 11:16 am (UTC)
vampwillow: (Default)
From: [personal profile] vampwillow
it is a total fake ... no matter what you put in, *you* will see a high figure and everyone else a *low* figure.

Profile

ramtops: (Default)
ramtops

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags