ramtops: (spikey hair)
[personal profile] ramtops
it's very good to see gay couples getting the same rights as heterosexual married couples (see Guardian link).

but where are the rights for straight, unmarried couples. I have many friends living in long term unmarried relationships, and this is discrimination, pure and simple.

what's the justification? The "sanctity of marriage"?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-31 03:39 am (UTC)
vampwillow: (Default)
From: [personal profile] vampwillow
a major part of the problem is that word 'Marry/iage'. It is almost as if it is imbued with a special meaning other than 'partnership recorded officially'. Of course, for some people who come from the religeous side of it, it is.

But it shouldn't be.

I would be happy (as written in my own LJ) for *all* couples to have to have a civil resistration and then choose *optionally* to do the religious bit ...

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-31 03:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ramtops.livejournal.com
a major part of the problem is that word 'Marry/iage'

indeed.

Profile

ramtops: (Default)
ramtops

March 2016

S M T W T F S
  1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags